Back to Opportunities
Viruses on vegetable seeds – dead or alive
What questions do you have about this RFP?
Get them answered by the team at BASF.
Background

Providing healthy (vegetable) seeds to customers is a prerequisite for sustainable food production. Healthy seeds are seeds that are free from pathogenic organisms that can be transmitted to the seedling growing from the seed and cause disease. Frequently used methods to determine seed health are ELISA and PCR that detect presence of proteins or nucleic acids but do not yield information on presence of a viable, infectious pathogen. A positive test result may also be caused by presence of non-viable organisms, genetic material left on the seed after a disinfection treatment or ‘environmental pollution’ with genetic material. The test result is not necessarily a reliable reflection of the risk that is present when the seed lot is brought into the market.

Seed companies contribute to the availability of healthy seeds by routinely testing seed to prevent or control plant pests and pathogens that may affect seed quality, seed movement, and their introduction into new territories. Management practices that prevent seeds from exposure to pests and diseases at all stages of seed development, production and commercialization significantly reduce overall pest risk, and seed health testing is often a final check. A seed health test is also frequently an import requirement imposed by National Plant Protection Organizations before allowing seed to enter into their territory.

What we're looking for

We are looking for a seed health test method that distinguishes between the presence of viable and non-viable pathogens in or on the seed.
Focus is on testing for tobamo viruses in solanaceous crops (tomato, pepper, eggplant). The test method we are looking for can be a new confirmation test but can also be something different altogether. New approaches for seed health tests that show viability of pathogens present in/on the seed are welcome!

Solutions of interest include:
  • Test that can be conducted in a laboratory environment.
Our must-have requirements are:
  • • Method must be fit-for-purpose • Scalability for routine use – speed (up to 7 days), costs (comparable to plant-based test), repeatability • No blocking by third party Intellectual Property Rights • Economics – costs of the project, costs per sample • Employee safety - no high-risk chemicals

  • • Method can be either destructive or non-destructive • Sensitivity comparable or higher than PCR

Our nice-to-have's are:
  • • PCR-based test • Easy adjustment of the test/method for other crops and other viruses.
What's out of scope:
  • Other crop-pest combinations than tobamo-viruses in solanaceous crops.
Acceptable technology readiness levels (TRL):
Levels 1-9
What we can offer you
Eligible partnership models:
Sponsored research
Benefits:
Sponsored Research
An amount of 10.000,- Euro is available to work out an interesting idea, e.g. to show proof-of-concept or collect more data on feasibility with the potential for follow on funding.
Expertise
Partners will have access to internal team/ experts as appropriate
Data
Partners can leverage the data set for additional insights regarding the solution
Facilities and Services
Partners can send samples for analysis at our facilities.
Reviewers
LJ
Lauren Junker
Technology Scout
TH
Tom Holcombe
Collaboration & Scouting NA
EI
Emir Islamovic
Innovation and Partnership Manager
KB
Kavita Bitra
Technology scout
SS
Sophia Steffens
Innovation & Scouting
Q&A with BASF

The Q&A is now closed.

Share Opportunity
Complete
Seeking partners focused on
Agricultural Science
Analytical Chemistry
Diagnostics
Food Engineering & Processing
Microbiology
Molecular Biology
Plant Biology
Plant Pathology
Virology
Biotechnology
3 more
Agriculture
Biology
Food Science & Nutrition
Halo home
Discover tomorrow's
breakthroughs today.
Get new partnering opportunities
delivered to your inbox.
© 2023 Halo Cures, Inc.